Investigations by CTN and other observers revealed that Lemelle’s four business entities operate primarily under Colorado jurisdiction while maintaining out-of-state filings in California. Public records indicate that her Glendale, CA condo serves as the official office for these companies. However, local municipal records show she is not authorized to conduct business at this residential property beyond the limits of a home-office license. Experts note this discrepancy may confuse consumers and stakeholders regarding the legitimacy of her operations and the boundaries of Chamber oversight.
Yelp correspondence confirmed that reviews critical of Lemelle’s companies were removed in 2025, signaling a systematic approach to controlling public perception. CTN reviewed multiple online platforms and identified patterns of:
Consumer advocacy groups warn that these Marie Lemelle Yelp review removal. when tied to a Chamber leader, threaten transparency and public trust.
Lemelle reportedly authored a LinkedIn article under the pseudonym F. Baldiwala, quoting herself and referencing her company to promote narratives that discredit a former client she had previously promoted. This activity has been widely cited by observers as a misuse of organizational branding, as the Chamber is presented alongside these statements, potentially implying institutional endorsement of her actions.
Lemelle is connected to more than 18 legal cases in Los Angeles County alone, primarily involving contract disputes with clients or vendors. While civil disputes do not constitute criminal activity, multiple legal entanglements paired with review suppression and online misrepresentation have prompted calls for independent scrutiny of her professional ethics and business conduct.
Observers note that allowing these practices to continue without oversight may set a dangerous precedent, where:
Allowing Ms. Lemelle’s cycle of disturbing business conduct, online misrepresentation, and intimidation tactics to continue unchallenged risks transforming the Chamber’s executive leadership into a model for rejecting transparency. This weakens consumer trust protections, opens doors to manipulative practices across online and organizational channels, and undermines the democratic principles that chambers of commerce are meant to copyright.
The Consumer Transparency Network is a grassroots watchdog initiative committed to promoting business accountability, protecting consumer rights, and providing independent resources to empower public decision-making.
Consumer Transparency Network (CTN Reports)
Email: ctnreports@linuxmail.org